Walking Pad Comparison Chart

Walking Pad Performance Comparison (2025)

Comparing Homefitness Code S1 and C1 models against best, average, and worst-in-class products

Category Model Performance Score
User Interface/Ease of Use
S1: 8.5/10
C1: 7.5/10
Exercise Quality
S1: 7.5/10
C1: 8.5/10
Features
S1: 7/10
C1: 8.5/10
Storability
S1: 9/10
C1: 7.5/10
Ease of Assembly
S1: 9.5/10
C1: 8/10
Max Speed
S1: 7/10
C1: 9/10
(S1: 8 km/h, C1: 12 km/h)
Weight Capacity
TIE: Both 8/10
(120 kg for both models)
Noise Level
S1: 8.5/10
C1: 6.5/10
App Quality
S1: 6.5/10
C1: 8.5/10
User Reviews Score
S1: 8/10
C1: 9/10
Value for Money
S1: 9/10
C1: 7.5/10
Homefitness Code S1
Homefitness Code C1
Tied Score
Best Product
Average Product
Worst Product
Looking for the best walking pad deal? Select your country below to check current prices and availability in your region.

Our Recommendations

Based on our comprehensive analysis of the Homefitness Code S1 and C1 walking pads, here are our personalized recommendations to help you choose the right model for your specific needs:

Choose the Homefitness Code S1 if:

  • You prioritize ease of use with a simple, intuitive interface
  • You need a compact solution with excellent storability (perfect for small spaces)
  • You prefer quick and hassle-free assembly with minimal setup time
  • You’re sensitive to noise and need a quieter walking experience
  • You’re budget-conscious and looking for the best value for money
  • You primarily use the walking pad for light to moderate walking sessions

Choose the Homefitness Code C1 if:

  • You need higher maximum speeds for running workouts (up to 12 km/h)
  • You want a more comprehensive feature set with advanced workout options
  • You prefer superior exercise quality with better cushioning and stability
  • You value a high-quality companion app with detailed fitness tracking
  • You plan to use the walking pad for more intensive fitness training
  • You’re looking for a more robust build quality for long-term durability

Analysis Highlights:

  • User Interface: S1 offers a more straightforward, user-friendly interface compared to C1’s feature-rich but slightly more complex controls.
  • Performance: C1 excels with higher maximum speed (12 km/h vs 8 km/h) and better exercise quality, making it ideal for more serious fitness enthusiasts.
  • Design: S1 features an ultra-slim design that’s easier to store and set up, while C1 offers a more robust but bulkier construction.
  • Technology: C1 provides advanced app connectivity and tracking features, whereas S1 focuses on simplicity with basic tracking capabilities.
  • Noise Level: S1 operates more quietly, making it better suited for shared living spaces or apartment settings.
  • Value: At a lower price point, the S1 provides excellent value for casual users, while the C1’s higher cost reflects its premium features and capabilities.